If everyone hates censorship so much, why do those “censorship-free” alternative social media sites always fail?

We don’t have to guess. We know.

You have the right to say what you want. You do not have the right to use other people’s stuff for free.

Nazis.

Amazon planning $10B investment in North Carolina for data center and AI campus - AP News

Because you’re confusing two different things.

“Censorship-free” social media sites quickly become Nazi bars where people exchange child porn. Normal human beings don’t hang out in Nazi bars with pedophiles.

Who is the #1 user of completely free digital communications networks that let you say absolutely anything? Who most wants that?

Colonoscopy screening at age 45 yields neoplasia rates close to older adults: Study supports guideline change - Medical Xpress

Now, say you’re an ordinary person. You don’t like child porn. You’re not a Nazi. You don’t want to shoot up a school or blow up the White House.

Why do “censorship-free” social media networks always fail? Well, let’s see. Sit down and think. Think really, really hard.

Who is the #2 user of completely free digital communications networks that let you say absolutely anything? Who else wants that?

Have Prince Harry and Meghan Markle lost it? Royal Family source makes shocking claim after ‘fake bump’ video goes viral - Mint

So.

Child pornographers.

The #1 problem people who make and consume child pornography have is connecting the producers with the buyers. Any “censorship-free” network quickly gets overrun with child porn. Classic example: 8kun.

David Beckham scores a winner with the royal circle - BBC

If I let you borrow my bike for free, I have the right to tell you you can’t do certain things with it, and I have the right to take it back. Why? Because it’s my property, not yours.

The #3 user? Terrorists. 8kun was used to plan 3 different school shootings in a 6-month period.

That has nothing to do with social media.

6 Foods You Should Eat More of After 60, According to Dietitians - EatingWell

I hate censorship. That is, I think the government has no place controlling what people say, read, express, or create, except insofar as is necessary to prevent things like terroristic threats, dissemination of classified information, fraud, false advertising, and so on.

Are you going to stay on a social media site that’s all photos of babies being raped, Nazis posting graphic descriptions of finishing what Hitler started, and plans for school shootings?

If i let you use my computer network for free, I have the right to tell you you can’t do certain things with it, and I have the right to kick you off. Why? Because it’s my property, not yours.

How is it, in the USA, a country with 334 million people, the choice of President comes down to two aged men, one of whom is a liar as well as a criminal, one who appears to be on his way to dementia. Surely a democratic country can put up better?